maandag 11 september 2017

PBL trigger 2 branding and marketing communications

  • What is brand identity vs. brand image?

The definition of brand identity according to the business dictionary: The visible elements of a brand (such as colors, design, logotype, name and symbol) that together identify and distinguish the brand in the consumers’ mind.


The definition of brand identity according to Investopedia: A company’s brand identity is how that business wants to be perceived by consumers. The components of the brand (name, logo, tone, tagline, typeface) are created by the business to reflect the value the company is trying to bring to the market and to appeal to its customers. Brand identity is separate from brand image – the term for how consumers actually perceive the brand.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/brand-identity.asp

the definition of brand image according to the business dictionary: The impression in the consumers’mind of a brand’s total personality (real and imaginary qualities and shortcomings). Brand image is developed over time through advertising campaings with a consistent theme, and is authenticated through the consumers’ direct experience.


the definition of brand image according to management study guide: Brand image is the current view of the customers about a brand. It can be defined as a unique bundle of associations within the minds of target customers. It signifies what the brand presently stands for. It is a set of beliefs held about a specific brand. In short, it is nothing but the consumers’ perception about the product.


The difference between brand identity and brand image:

In this article that was written by Zahra Mahdi and 2 other writers, it is explained that the main difference between brand identity and image is the fact that brand identity is the way a company wants to represent itself to its stakeholders, how they want to be perceived. A company has to determine a frame in which they specify their brand’s uniqueness and value. The meaning, aim and self-image has to be specified and they should be based on the company’s core competences.

An example is the logo of Nike. Nike adopted a check mark as their brand logo and that creates a positive association as a check mark is indicated as a sign of approval. The article describes that consumers usually have a limited time frame to make an informed purchase decision when they have to choose between similar products. Therefore, consumers use brand image to make a purchase decision. Consumers acknowledge product quality faster when the product they want to buy is from a company they perceive as a one with a positive brand image. A company has to determine a frame in which they specify their brand’s uniqueness and value.


 Brand image is how a company actually is perceived by its stakeholders. Stakeholders base their perception of their experiences with a company. The article describes that consumers usually have a limited time frame to make an informed purchase decision when they have to choose between similar products. Therefore, consumers use brand image to make a purchase decision. Consumers acknowledge product quality faster when the product they want to buy is from a company they perceive as a one with a positive brand image

There could be a difference between the message a company wants to send and how it is perceived by stakeholders. A consumer bases the brand image of a company of their own experiences with the company so it is important for a company to make sure that consumer experience the same values the company tries to represent in their brand identity.

Compare different brand identity models.



Brand identity prism by Kapferer.

The brand identity prism consists of 6 different concepts(physique, personality, relationship, culture, reflectiom and self-image). Together, they form the brand identity that is shown to the consumers.

Physique:

The physique consists of the salient objectives, which are the features that immediately come to mind when thinking about a brand. Furthermore it is the brand’s strength of character and its intangible outer value. Relevant questions when defining the physical facet are what is it concretely? What does it do? What does it look like? For Volvo it is the security that represents the physical facet. (Kapferer, J-N. 2004)

Personality:

This is a way in which the company is communicating its products. It describes what kind of a person the brand would be if it were human and its characteristics. A spokesperson can easily form a brand’s personality. An example of brand personality could be a famous athlete or afiction, like the Marlboro Man. (ibid)

Culture:

Culture is a set of values that are the brand’s inspiration. It is the source of a brand’s core values. Culture links the brand to the firm and plays an essential role in differentiating the brand. A question which can be asked is; what are the values for which the brand stands for? An example of culture are banks, such as American express gold card which symbolizes dynamic, triumph and capitalism where money is shown and flashed about. (ibid)



Relationship:

Every brand has to maintain a good relationship with their customer, which marketing measurements are intended to do. A question to be asked is; how does the brand want to be seen by customers in marketing communication? Dior symbolizes a relationship that is extravagant and grandiose, with a desire to shine like gold. (ibid)

Reflection:

It is a description of the way customers wishes to be seen as a result of using a brand. This reflection becomes identification. The company needs to answer the question; what would the users imagine while using the product? The reflection is the idealized vision of the company’s target group and is its outward reflection. For example Coca-cola that has a wider clientele than the narrow segment it reflects. This is because the younger segment identifies Coca-cola as a dream and the older as a way of living. They segment their target group based on customers’ lifestyles rather than age. (ibid)

Self-image:

 Self-image is the target’s internal reflection. It is individuals’ attitudes towards certain brands and by purchasing certain brands customers send out a picture of who they want to be. (ibid)


De chernatony model of brand identity

Explanation by the article:

Personality:

 The brand personality establishes what specific characteristics the brand has, and these characteristics should indicate how the brand would be in human life. By humanizing a brand, it plays a more central part in consumers’ lives (Kapferer, 2008), which is good considering individuals are to keener towards brands that share the same or similar ideas (Ponnam, 2007). Aaker (1997) also states that brand personality refers to the set of human characteristics associated with a brand. It regards how the brand personality enables a consumer to express his or her self through the consumption of a brand. Furthermore, brand personality increases consumer preference and usage, evoke emotions in consumers, and increases levels of trust and loyalty (Aaker, 1997). Aaker (1997) has developed a theoretical framework of brand personality dimensions that measures the perception of a brand. These are measured by considering the extent to which the respondents believe it possesses the characteristics of personality dimensions. This framework enables experimental researchers to measure symbolic meanings of brands as if they were people (Aaker, 1997). Swaminathan et al. (2009) highlight that brand managements need to understand which brand personality traits are going to matter to customers in order to attach the potential of brand personality. However, not all customers are equally sensitive to a brand’s personality. Interpersonal attachment styles determine what types of customers are most likely to be influenced by a brand’s personality (Swaminathan et al., 2009).






Positioning:
 According to Kapferer (2008), companies can distinguish brands according to their positioning, which is when one emphasizes the distinctive characteristics that make it attractive to consumers and different from its competitors. Keller et al. (2002) agree that positioning sets the product apart from the competition. However, the researchers stress that companies also need to pay attention to other aspects of the positioning; understanding the frame of reference that your brand is working in and address the features that your brand has in common with the competition. This will ensure the companies a better understanding of the market (Keller et
al., 2002). Kapferer (2008) further states that positioning controls the words that are communicated to the customer and can be explained as the brand’s message and outward expression of the inner substance. However, the researcher rather refers to this as "phvsique", which mainly describes the brand's physical qualities and the brand's performance characteristics (Kapferer 2008). Bronnenberg and Wathieu (1996) state that positioning is an important aspect that managers need to take into account when evaluating the promotion asymmetry and communication. Moreover, Sujan and Bettman (1989) believe that the aspects of the brand itself, such as physical attributes or situational factors, determine which positioning strategy is best suited for the brand. The positioning also influences the customers’ perception of the brand and their memory, which in turns can determine in what category the brand is seen to operate in (Sujan & Bettman, 1989). However, Kotler and Gertner (2002) state that brands can add or subtract from the perceived value of a product. They also suggest that differentiation based on product characteristics do not motivate consumers or making them able to evaluate the products in dept. Companies should therefore use the combination of a brand name and brand significance in order to achieve a better evaluation for consumers (Kotler & Gertner 2002).
Vision and culture
As De Chernatony (1999) mentions, a brand needs a clear vision that describes a well-defined direction of what it wants to achieve. Managers need to envisage the brand’s environment for at least five years ahead and consider how the brand is going to make the future world they operate in better (Collins & Poras, 1996). The brand culture describes the set of values that are feeding the brand’s inspiration, as well as explains from where the product is derived (Kapferer, 2008). To improve the communication with consumers and decrease misunderstandings, Kapferer (2008) stresses that brands need its own culture from which every product should originate. Banerjee (2008) adds that the cultural values are principles that determine how people perceive themselves and others. It is also highlighted that marketers need to view the brand culture as a main weapon considering it can increase the competitive advantage in operating markets (Banerjee 2008). Kapferer (2008) and Schmidt et al. (1995) stress that the culture links the brand to the firm and highlights the differencing factors, making it stand out from the competition Kapferer (2008) further states that these differentiating factors of the culture can refer to the basic principles leading the brand’s outward signs, such as product and communication. It is also mentions that countries of origin are for example a highly valuable factor used by well-established companies; Volkswagen stands for Germany and IKEA stands for Sweden (Kapferer 2008). Moreover, forms and shapes, colours and materials in the visual and auditory communications express the brand’s culture and values. This indicates that aesthetics either can add value to a brand, as well destroy a reputation if handling wrong (Schmidt et al., 1995). De Chernatony (1999) further elaborates that one needs to audit brand culture in order to develop a strategy for reaching consumers. Schein (1984) believes that this can be measured through the brand’s visible artefacts, employees’ and managers’ values and mental models of the people involved in brand building activities. One can then understand which values that have remained unchanged over time, such as core values, and values that have changed. This audit illustrates the brand culture’s suitability to help achieve the brand vision, through appreciating the gaps between desired and current components of culture (Schein, 1984)
Relationship:
 Relationship is defined by Blackston (1992) as the interaction between consumers’ attitude towards the brand and the brand’s attitude towards the consumers. This means that consumers’ perception plays an important part into the brand communication (Blackston 1992). Kapferer (2008) stresses that companies should include the relationship facet into their brand in order to succeed in the process of transaction and exchange. Meenaghan (1995) adds that companies need to involve brands into the world of the consumer in order to gain a ―magnetic‖ relationship between them. Kapferer (2008) and Lannon and Cooper (1983) agree that brands need to be the voice that the consumers hear. The communication should answer who you are, where you are in life and where you are going. Brands and consumers are therefore connected since they are part of ourselves and we are part of our brands (Lannon & Cooper, 1983). Swaminathan et al. (2007) and Fournier (1998) mention that consumers therefore form strong relationships with those brands that have values and personality associations that are similar to their selfconcept. Brands need to act, deliver and relate in accordance to the consumers, and companies need to consider this when communicating to the consumers. Every part of the communication, such as images and symbols must relate to and exploit consumers’ values and lifestyles (Kapferer 2008). Broadbent and Cooper (1987) mention that can particularly be a way to increase the added value and differentiating factors of the brand. Moreover, De Chernatony (1999) explains that the relationship and increased interaction can boost the innovation and success for the brands, considering the company gain furthered understanding of the consumer. One downside of the Brand image studies however is that the focus of the relationship is on customer to brand, which makes the assumption that the brand is passive (Blackston, 1992).

 Aker model
This model describes 4 ways a brand identiy can be shown by a company.

The difference between the models:

The kapfere model explains the different aspects of brand identity and the difference between consumers perception and the identity that a company wants to project.

The de chernatony model focusses more on the internal aspects of brand identity (staff behaviour and the repuation a company receives because of that.

The aker model describes 4 ways in which a company can show their brand identity.


  • How is the visual identity based on the brand identity?

The definiton of visual identity by the business dictionary: Visible elements of a brand, such as color, form, and shape, which encapsulate and convey the symbolic meaning that cannot be imparted through words alone. In a broader (corporate) sense, it may include elements such as building architecture, color schemes, and dress code.


How Visual Brand Identity Shapes Consumer Response Barbara J. Phillips University of Saskatchewan Edward F. McQuarrie Santa Clara University W. Glenn Griffin University of Alabama

The article describes that the visual identity of a company can be used to reinforce the brand identity a company wants to project to consumers. When a consumer interacts with a brand they are exposed to visual stimuli such as logo’s, colors, shapes and even fonts. These visual elements become a part of the brand image a consumer perceives and that is why visual identity is an important part of  the brand identity. The article gives some examples of the way visual identity is used in advertising and one of the examples is that some companies try to have as much of their company colors in their advertising as possible to reinfore the brand image of consumers.


Analyze the brand identity of a chosen company with a suitable model.

Coca cola with the kapfere model

Phisque:
Word famous bottle design
Red color with white letters

Personality:

Happiness
Share a coke
Being with friends
Refreshing

Relationship

Coca cola wants their stakeholders to see coca cola as a company that provides you with a lot of different drinks for a good time with your friends

Culture:

Core values of coca cola are: American values of pursuing happiness

Reflection:

Hip
User of top quality brand

Self image:

Social and happy


Analyze (or design) the visual identity of a chosen company.

The company that I will be analyzing is called strato. Strato is a german webhoster who sells internet domains and sitebuilder packages. Strato’s company color is orange and blue and when you visit the strato website, you can see that they use a lot of orange and blue on their webpage to try and associate the color with the brand. The company logo can be also be seen on the website and they use a clear and professional font. They use photos of people who are either happy or who are working and the people all wear funny masks. I think that they do this to show that strato is a serious company who also wants their customers to be happy at the same time while also expecting good results from strato

This gives you an example of the strato’s website.

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten